With the introduction of new federal and state initiatives such as the Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF), Race to the Top, and School Improvement Grants (SIG), focus has been increasingly on determining teacher effectiveness and linking those ratings to compensation decisions. One challenge states and local education agencies (LEAs) across the country regularly face is identifying measures of student growth that are rigorous and comparable1 for all teachers, especially those in nontested grades and subjects. Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) have recently come to the forefront as a potential solution for measuring student growth, particularly for educators in subjects or grades not covered by a state standardized assessment (Prince et al, 2009). When states and LEAs use measures of student growth to inform evaluation and compensation decisions, ensuring that the measures are fair, rigorous, and comparable is important. This paper discusses the steps for using SLOs as a measure of growth and identifies key considerations for successful implementation. In addition to this overview, the paper highlights two districts that have successfully integrated SLOs into their performance-based compensation programs.
Share Your Thoughts
Comment on this page with your take on this resource - it's extremely helpful for the community to know how helpful this resource is before reading it, and it lets Ed Partners know what to provide more or less of. Or, you can simply click Like to give it a
Here are some sample questions to help guide your review:
- Let us know your rating (1-4 stars) and we'll update the rating accordingly.
- What one or two ideas resonate most with you? Why?
- What is still challenging or confusing for you to wrap your mind around? What outstanding questions do you have?
This page has no comments.